Monday, June 3, 2013
Tanzania condemns Malawi over border dispute
Tanzania
has brushed off claims by the Malawian government that it has been intervening
works being undertaken by former SADC Heads of State in their efforts to
resolve border conflict between the two States. Speaking to reporters recently in Dar es Salaam, Minister for Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation
Bernad Membe said the Tanzania government has recalled its officer Dr John
Tesha, whom the Malawian government claims, has been leaking information to
Tanzania government. Membe has also called on the Malawian government to
respect the agreement the two governments put forward in their last meeting
held in Dar es Salaam on 17th November last year whereby, the two
parties had decided to take their matter to former Heads of government of SADC
region. The decision was reached after having held a series of four meetings to
amicably resolve the matter which the two states had agreed and or disagreed.
At the end of the meeting it was decided to forward the matter to the
respective former heads of governments of SADC region committee members led by
Joachim Chisano for resolution. As the committee is yet to give out the outcome
of the dispute, Malawian government has put many claims as to how they have
lost confidence with the arbitration committee members on the grounds that, one
member Dr. John Tesha has been leaking the information to Tanzania government. However,
Minister Membe has dismissed such claims saying as baseless and that do not
bear any truth in it, and in view of this has urged the Malawian government to
honour the agreement which they had arrived at in their last meeting held in
mid of November last year. The November agreement made clear that, in case one
State would not be satisfied by the decision passed by the committee members of
SADC heads of States, then it would be allowed to make an appeal to the International
Court of Justice (ICJ) for further judgment. After having realized contradiction
in between is emerging from Malawians, Membe noted that, the government had
sent a request to remove Dr. Tesha among the list and be replaced by former
Mozambican Foreign Minister Leonard Simao which has been done. “This is the second time the Malawian
government raises claims that Tanzania is doing secret plans in order to be
favoured by members of the Arbitration committee” he said adding that, earlier
the Malawian government had claimed that, Tanzania had changed the map that
shows the demarcation of its Southern Highland region which ironically was not
a factor that was meant to disengage evidences. This is not the first time
Malawi has made such claims, which are baseless much as they are outrageous as
all world maps and the fact on the ground shows that the lake transcends the
common border and each country has got an equal right to it. Residents in parts
of Mbinga District in Ruvuma Region, which are of course very much inside
Tanzania, have always depended on the lake for their water (with its various
uses) and fish needs. It has also been a tourist attraction with visitors
arriving to sample its beauty. In view of the current situation, the government
has issued its five stances over the continued dispute which is not yet
resolved and among the most important point it has dismissed claims by Malawian
government that, Tanzania receives back information from its committee member. The
government has openly said that, it has a confidence with Chisano’s committee
members as it has drawn people of high calibre who include former Botswana’s
President Festus Mogoe, former South Africa President Thabo Mbeki and himself
Joachim Chisano former Mozambican President. Others are lawyers who are experts
in conflict resolutions which is consists of 7 people drawn from different African
countries. These include Judge Raymond Ranjeva a retired judge of the
International Court of Justice (ICJ), Professor George Kanyeihamba, a retired
judge of the Ugandan High Court. Others are Judge Baney Afako a legal
consultant for Africa Union in issues related with Sudan border conflict, Dr.
Gbanga Oduntun a law Professor and a member of the crisis commission of the
border dispute between Nigeria and Cameroon. Others are Professor Martin Pratt,
the Director of the Geographical research activities on issues related with
border disputes, Dr. Dire David Tladi, a member of the law commission from the United
Nations, and of issues, and Miguel Chisano head of the institute which is
primarily concerned with the border disputes in the sea and in dry land. Membe
also noted that, the government is worried to see that, instead of Malawian
government to keep waiting for the outcome to be released by the Chisano’s
committee, it has been speculating rumours through media organs purporting the
truth about the matter. In view of this, however, he has asked the government
of Malawi to stop intermediating by forwarding their claims to western media
organs such as in US,UK and EU and instead it should wait to see what Chisano’s
committee would decide and contrary to that, then it would appeal to ICJ if not
satisfied as earlier agreed in last November meeting. He also noted that, on
Thursday this week, he received a letter from the Chairman of the former SADC
leaders Joachim Chisano ensuring him that, the committee members is still going
on with the mediation activities though are late to submit their decision since
the submission of their request that had to be worked for three months’ time. However,
Chisano noted in his letter that, he was busy with the recent Kenya elections
and that he had not yet had enough professional members in matters related to
border conflict resolutions that he took time to look for. However, he has
promised to submit their report sooner. As the Chisano’s committee is still
working on the issue, Tanzania government has asked the Malawian government not
to tamper with the status core of the area in dispute. Minister Membe noted
that, the Malawian people are still doing the exploration activities in the
area which they vividly know is against once such an area is still in conflict
and the owner has not yet been declared. He queried in disgust and wanted the
message to reach the Malawian government. Meanwhile, many Tanzanians will
remember the year 2012 as yet another point in time when the Lake Nyasa border
dispute became a thorny issue. The historical mix-up on the legal border line
had created panic and fear as dialogues between Tanzania and Malawi came to a
deadlock. The origin of the current crisis between Tanzania and Malawi is an
agreement made between the British and the Germans on July 1, 1890. The agreement
known as the Treaty of Heligoland (The Anglo-Germany Heligoland Treaty) was
signed in Berlin, Germany, between the British and the Germans. In the case of
Lake Nyasa, the British and the Germans agreed that the border should be on
Tanzania's shores and the whole lake was declared to be on Malawi's side. In
the sixth section (Article VI) of the Convention, the colonists agreed to make
border adjustments if necessary, depending on the circumstances and situation
of the place. From such a background, Malawi's argument is based on the 1890's
agreement but Tanzania bases on the 1982 UN Convention on Law of the Sea that
stipulates that in case nations are bordered by a water body (sea or lake), the
border of the two nations will always be on the middle of the water body. Several
meetings between the ministers of foreign affairs of both countries and other
representatives have been held in a quest to find a lasting solution amicably
but every part stood firm to defend its position on the matter to the extent
that the dialogues reached a deadlock.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment